Jonas Smedegaard dijo [Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:55:57AM +0200]: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:30:12AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:31:23AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > >> And yes, next year I want a flag for each event "(not) to be > >> videoed". > > > >This would be a really reasonable extension for Penta. If there would > >only be some documentation how to report Penta bugs ... > > ...or for some alternative tool. Ana mentioned Penta being too complex > and too buggy and proposed to switch (albeit that noone responded...)
(wow, several days later... Had a >200 mail backlog in this box!) Believe me, it is not as easy as it sounds. We used a very different ConfMS system written mostly by me for DebConf 5 and 6 (Comas). It had a much simpler layout and it was easier to understand, yes, but the complexity a DebConf entails made it implode. I am actually grateful we found Penta. I resurrected Comas after several years. Well, resurrected... Took its name and put it to a completely different codebase. It is way more flexible. Still, I do not expect to push DebConf to switch away from Penta. Not by far. -- Gunnar Wolf • [email protected] • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
