martin f krafft wrote: > Canonical wants to make package maintenance uniform. The pragmatic > approach for them — since vcs-pkg isn't there yet — is to import > everything in Bazaar. I think we managed to agree that cross-VCS > support (which is n-factorial) isn't feasible, and so the import > would have to have an export associated with it. Concretely, rather > than them importing my mdadm (in Git) repo and expecting me to > access their Bazaar repo to extract patches, it would make sense for > Canonical to export commits into a Git repo of their own (presumably > the one they mirrored from), which is the one I will then use.
Well, format-patch-style patches attached to bug reports would also allow you to access the changes, so I'm not sure that providing a git repo is the only way to do it. > Jelmer's bzr-git adapter could greatly facilitate this. That's true nevertheless. Thanks, James _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
