On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: > And IMHO we disclose too much information in schedule.
As an attendee and speaker I found that not enough information was available about the schedule and set of non-approved talks. I had to brute-force the talk ID space to decide if there would be enough interesting events and read about them. I could not report schedule conflicts between talks I needed to attend until the schedule had already been announced. I couldn't easily find out who the speaker for an event was. In my opinion the too much information issue was in leaking the registered attendee list to people loading the event registration page. Also the default for attendees should be to be able to mark their attendance but choose who sees it (admins, speakers, attendees or general public), with admins (or maybe speakers) being the default. The presented information was confusing in some instances; I had to inform people that bold means it is the speaker or that you can login to confirm that. I think it would be better to define a list of people and their relationship with the event (speaker, facilitator, panel member, other required, video team, likely to attend, might attend, etc) and present those roles on the event page. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
