On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > This provision has been ignored on our mailing lists for as long as I've > been a member of the project. There was some recent discussion of the > packet radio reference that concluded that this justification was rather > dubious. I wonder if we should take it out of that document as well, > although this is not the right place to talk about that.
Right, my point being, even if maybe not very clear, that you might want to look at the mailing lists coc as well if you decide to look into this _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
