On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Holger Levsen <[email protected]> wrote: > ok, found my words again: make these the lanyards for people who want their > pictures taken. (and TBH, I think this years white swirly ones were quite very > well visible - once again perfect is the enemy of good. ;-)
Agreed; perfect is the enemy of good. A workable solution for all sides seems to be better than a perfect solution [for one group]. One that, realistically speaking, puts so much burden on another group that said solution may end up being generally ignored. With your video hat on: How do you propose to do room shots? Who will contact all the speakers and people asking questions who forgot their lanyard before uploading video? Some numbers on how many people checked the "no photo" option vs how many did not might help here, but I suspect that the common case is "photo" and that's what we should design for: the common case. Richard PS: This stance could be applied to all sorts of other preferences as well. Should we default to fruitarian food? Personally, I would _really_ like a totally non-smoking venue, including outdoors. Yes, this is reductio ad absurdum on purpose to illustrate my point. _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
