Hi Martin, On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 11:52:24AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > What you've put on top isn't the important stuff. It merely is your > own personal goals.
Of course my point are my goals. Do you think I can read minds and over the internet no less!? Do feel free to propose more *important stuff* :-). > While I would welcome a BoF on Debian's network configuration tools, > I'm really not interested in any talk where the initiators have > already decided on the outcome and started by disagreeing with > everything the maintainer of a specific package has done that doesn't > align with their own personal goals. It's not a Talk it's a BoF. These are just sparks to get discussions going. Any or all may sizzle, that's for the room to decide. Think of it more as a crib sheet for when the room runs out of things to talk about for us to go "uuuuh what seems most relevant now given what we've discussed so far". As such the order is kind of unimportant. The between the lines meaning of the original message you may have missed here is that we put the team organizational points first and ran out of brainpower to sort the rest. Hence "tried" :-) I've reordered things a bit more now. Hope to see (or hear from) you during the session, --Daniel <3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
