On 9/20/07, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also sprach Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.09.19.1940 +0100]:
> This does not include any mention of the possibility of managing the > money outside of Argentina, which at least UBS would be willing to > do (I checked). I did not include this, because I'm not sure how this would work. Money transfers from the outside to Argentina require a signed contract (or similar paper) between the two parties. It makes sense for us to sign a contract with SPI or Debian UK, but it does not make sense for the Hotel (which is the main receiver of the money) to sign a contract with whoever is entitled to the foreign account. Thus, even if UBS is willing to do it, the international money transfer would be a lot of paper work, a lot of time wasted and it might even not get approved (if the contract doesn't make sense, you can't get the money). I'd rather do the paperwork first, with a contract that makes sense. Letting the money in is not so much of a problem, just paperwork. Jörg was worried about getting the money out. This can be prevented by not transferring extra money. -- Besos, Marga _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
