On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 09:08:16PM +0100, Moray Allan wrote: > Perhaps the teams' responses for the first points could be prepared (and > maybe posted) in advance, rather than having so much time allocated in > the meeting itself for 'non-interactive' writing. > > i.e. > * each venue describe what are the good points about the other venues > * each venue describe the weak points in their own venue
The NYC team will answer those two bullet points, as well as giving our responses to the numbered priority list in the meeting agenda, on the wiki in advance of the meeting, and will email links to this list. Other bids might want to do the same to speed things up. We've also consolidated and updated the rest of our current bid info on the main NewYork page: http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf10/NewYork Questions are welcome in advance of the meeting via IRC or email. (We haven't forgotten about Moray's past-DebConfs comparison question and will answer it today or not-late tomorrow NYC time.) - Jimmy Kaplowitz [email protected] _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
