On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:38:38AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: >Hi, > >On Freitag, 5. Juni 2009, Richard Darst wrote: >> I really wish I wasn't replying to myself so much since it makes me >> seem crazy[0], but I'd like to point out that if you extremely dislike >> the idea of pushing the deadline, it would be more productive to push >> for the sponsorship meeting on Friday, and then we can not bend the >> deadline *and* give the lead time I suggested[1]. > >Yes, but if we dont have the sponsorship decissions _as well as_ the talk >selections done by, aeh, today, aeh, I dont think we should keep June 7th as >deadline. Some people need that information to decide whether they should or >can come. > >(Also talk selection, because eg if they give an official talk their >university will pay their trip.) > >Moving the deadline a week aint thaaat bad, IMO.
I don't think we have any option, to be honest. Best time we have so far for the meeting looks like Sunday afternoon (UTC). -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] "I've only once written 'SQL is my bitch' in a comment. But that code is in use on a military site..." -- Simon Booth _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
