On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:12:02PM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> The one improvement that greater than one person thought would be
> useful (including me) was to select some of the talks to be named
> "Featured". This can be done very late, so we don't even have to make
> a big deal out of it. I think it would help guide people to know what
> is most interesting. If someone asks why they aren't scheduled/aren't
> scheduled at a good time, we can say "We give priority to featured
> talks". However, still, we try to keep it as flat as possible, and
> de-emphasize this.
ACK.
> > Last year I had a name finding discussion and I learned that it has
> > a very high bike shedding potential. I'm also there does not exist
>
> yes... but I think there is a general agreement now. We'll see on
> Monday.
Great. Next step after decision will be a realisation in Penta
soon enough to work for next years DebConf.
See you
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
