Hi, On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > One potential advantage of having plenary talks might be a better sense > of cohesion for attendees. > > However, we already have the day trip and the formal dinner as events > which i expect will do some of that. And of course, no one is proposing > required attendance or anything silly like that. The hacklab will still > be open, and some people will no doubt be sleeping or eating elsewhere. > > Another advantage might be to communicate specific concerns to the > broader group, for example if we have a wrap-up session with reportbacks > from track coordinators, bosnia/DC11 exhortations, and RCBC victor > announcements. > > Do you see any advantages to having plenaries? Any disadvantages?
I think you described the advantages well :-)
Another topic I'd probably like to see explained and discussed is the status
quo of the squeeze release. It's kind of the main topic of Debian ;)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
