On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Richard Darst <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:47:48PM +0100, Moray Allan wrote:
> > Thanks to all those who've responded with their views.  Below is an
> > updated draft description of DebConf's goals, which I hope reflects
> > the various comments made.
>
> I think this sounds good.  It think it pretty well reflects what we
> are working for.  Of course, it can be an evolving document.
>
> However, people who read this shouldn't think it means this is all we
> care about, and people should want to join and work on improving
> whatever they want to, even if it isn't one of the things on the
> list.
>

I concur with Richard's position, in that we definitely don't want to
exclude other motivating factors, but would agree that these reasons Moray
summarized and believe they would be fairly unanimously supportable by our
community.

As an aside, my personal favorite part of DC10 was it's function as a
technology showcase for emerging technologies, and the ability to interact
directly with the developers responsible. e.g kfreebsd, and nexenta.

Thanks for pushing this forward.

-Brian

P.S. - Sorry for not speaking up sooner, I've been heads down dealing with
trying to wrap up my 2009 tax return. The deadline for those folks who
filed extensions is tomorrow. :(
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team

Reply via email to