I don't think this will be necessary, as we agreed to not have 2 types of sponsorship (meaning local and global). One sponsorship type should be enough.
Velimir On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Pablo Duboue <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Damyan Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Two things need to be decided: > > > > 1) sponsorship levels (thresholds) and whether to provide a different > > set for local sponsors > > 2) possible rearrangement of benefits suggested by Holger > > > > What would be the preferred way to decide these? A meeting? > > A meeting might be good. Count me in if you decide to go that route. > > P. > _______________________________________________ > Debconf-team mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team >
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
