Andreas Tille wrote: > I was working in travel sponsorship team last year because I was not > asking for sponsorship myself (because I was not coming). This year I > will ask myself for sponsorship and thus I hesitate to join a team to > handle an issue where I'm partly biased. If there is *really*, > *really* help needed I might consider joining as well but with mixed > feelings.
I have been on the team both receiving and not receiving sponsosrship in the past. I don't think you should feel bad about it, after all it is a team. And IMHO I don't think anyone would deny you of sponsorship :* This is a team where trust is important, and if there were no issues with your behaviour last time, which I don't know, but I'm sure of, hence, trust, I don't see why your help would not be welcome. In short. I see no conflict of interests, otherwise all members in the sponsoring team should be non-sponsored ones, which would make it very funny :) > > On 25th January 2011, at 20:00 UTC, we will have a meeting on > > #debconf-team (OFTC) to plan out our teams for DebConf11. We invite > > you to attend this meeting to get added to learn about the teams, > > and hopefully join where you would like. > > I hope that I'll be there. Same here. After skipping Debconf 10, I want back in the team, if everyone is ok with that. > Thanks for working that hard for DebConf Ditto! -- ยท''`. : :' : As Freud said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. `. `' `- Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
