Richard Darst dijo [Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:20:41PM -0400]: > Hi, > > Continuing on the "poster session" idea, here is a way we could > implement/track it. > http://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/PosterSession > > Suppose we created a "Poster Session" track in penta, which isn't an > actual talk, but just a way to register an intent to give a poster. > That way we can plan space/time depending on interest. > > Thoughts? If we can agree+do this Real Soon, then it can be included > in the call for papers to let people know and build interest.
Hummm... I think that'd be a bit overbending for Penta, although it could work. The thing is, the poster sessions will be held during a single "event" (that is, during an alloted timespan - 2hr perhaps?). The accepted "talks" for the poster sessions will not be scheduled by themselves, only listed as part of the (single) session. And although it could be managed as a track... Well, it does not have to have thematic coherency (which is our definition for tracks). I see you are trying with this to group a bit too much based on some coincidences. I'd rather suggest the poster coordinator set up a separate paper submission system, and then register a single (long) session in Penta, including the different files. (oh, that sounded quite like the whine of a system implementor when required to do something that breaks logic... Does anybody want to hack subsessions into Penta? :-} ) _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
