What you said here stands correct, but I believe I explained my reasons why I said to post those *two* logos, I even told you this privately. Please let's not get into unnecessary argument over this.
Adnan On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Holger Levsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Adnan, > > On Freitag, 15. April 2011, Adnan Hodzic wrote: >> I believe I'm talking to Vedran when I say this, please add Google and >> Canonical logo under the sponsors list. They are both going under the >> Silver level. > > The logos are now on the webpage (at the silver level), but > svn+ssh://[email protected]/svn/debconf-team/dc11/sponsors-table still > doesnt say how much _exactly_ they are sponsoring. > > This is pretty bad, this sponsors-table file is our authoritive tool and must > be up2date at all times, especially when putting logos online. Please fix this > immediatly. > > And, webmasters, please dont put logos online if we dont have all required > information. (Asking whether we have all info and whether they are in svn > should be sufficient :) > > > Thanks, > Holger > _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
