On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > Holger Levsen dijo [Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 03:32:13PM +0100]: >> after some more thinking I'd like to amend myself, with - I believe - >> editorial changes ;-) > > Fear!
Indeed. >> + link back to the company homepage. (If some company'd want a deeper link, I >> try to get some additional sponsorship for that ;-) > > We should not nitpick on that. We should just request an URL, any > URL. Sometimes the funds come from a very specific department in a > complicated structrue, and they want to make themselves visible. We > should not dictate if it's www.h01ger.eu or > https://holgi:[email protected]/FreeSoftware/projects?projectid=3&task=video I agree here -- the other use people made of deeper links was tracking, and I don't think there's much reason to charge them more just for being too lazy to scan their referrer logs. >> > PLATINUM - starting from $25,000 >> > >> > Benefits from gold, and also: >> >> - Status as "DebConf12 Conference Enabling Sponsor" > > What does "status" mean? Is it an extra title besides the metallic > sounding name? Holger wants to give a special name outside the normal series, AIUI. I can see the reasoning, but I'm not sure that "DebConf12 Conference Enabling Sponsor" will appeal to people more than "Platinum Sponsor". >> > - Logo on banner behind talk podiums / FIXMYSPANISH > > Logo impreso en el podio del ponente (FIXMYSPANISH) > >> [explicit talk benefit removed] > > Ok... Nobody has ever requested this, but if they did in exchange for > a truckload of cash, I think we would accept anyway Indeed. How about we leave it as an internally-documented option, but we don't push it in the sponsor pack? Holger seems mostly concerned that it confuses people / that it takes a lot of words to explain what we mean. -- Moray _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
