On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 12:42 -0400, Richard Darst wrote: > - DebConf11 surplus (about 25 k$) > - Debian guarentees (10 k$)
This looks like double-counting to me, as my impression was that the amount which the DPL agreed to extend as a guarantee would already count against the surplus from last year. But I also don't think that it fits with my view of what was agreed on DebConf funding to *aim* to spend that "surplus", rather than to keep it for problems that will doubtless occur in future years, if not this one. > We haven't talked about travel sponsorship yet, or identified where > that money will come from. I think that it is reasonable to ask for > DC11 surplus to be able to send out travel sponsorship confirmations > (and then hopefully not use that surplus). What do you all think? That sounds reasonable to me *iff* we are fairly sure that in the end we will get that much money from somewhere else -- how firmly do people believe that we will? -- Moray _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
