>> c) after DebConf: will bandwidth still be available for another 1-2 >> weeks? Will there be billing issues? > > I don't think Le Camp will be available after DebConf. And I think we > should only think about DebCamp parallel events. >
Topping up numbers for the DebCamp week is the highest priority However, bringing people for an extra week, post-DebConf, might give us a bigger discount (but only if Le Camp is available) > >> d) the other group must do ALL organising themselves: the only official >> relationship with DebConf is payment of money and share bandwidth. No >> formal collaboration on any social events or other efforts > > No, they will eat and "sleep" with us, and possibly use our hacklabs. > Additionally for "Le Camp" they will be part of DebConf. Let me clarify point (d): - do they need to have a separate front desk, or just share the DebCamp/DebConf front desk? - do they make registrations using Penta? Or do they just give a spreadsheet telling us how many beds they need for each night? We can decide these things at the meeting where we discuss the issue > So I think that groups should have some relation with Debian (or some of > our developers), and possibly that meetings should have some value also > for Debian. > Yes, but do we want to have - a group that will leave at the end of DebCamp, giving up their beds for the DebConf guests? - a group where people stay into DebConf too? The worst case scenario is that they all stay for an extra 1-2 nights to see a little bit of DebConf, and that there are not enough beds for other DebConf guests on the first 1-2 nights. Given the limited (326) beds, my feeling is we should aim for groups that won't stay during DebConf itself. _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
