Hi, On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 06:09:13PM +0100, Margarita Manterola wrote: >> It has been requested that those of us that have concerns about the >> DebConf13 location should formally raise them with the DPL and the >> DebConf chairs.
> As I apparently miss some context, what does "it has been requested" > mean here? I find the impersonal style weird in cases like this one, > when escalating decision making. Well, I didn't want to point any fingers. My intention had been to call to the attention of the local team that there were a number of unresolved concerns and that a group of people (me included) was really not happy with the chosen venue. I was told by the local team that they would still sign the contract, and that the only resource left was to escalate. As I said in my first mail, I would have preferred a different path. In any case, thanks a lot for having taken the time to read the logs and the context, and also for a well centered reply amid yet another "DebConf crisis". I await the replies of the DebConf chairs. -- Thanks, Marga _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
