Hi all, Le dimanche, 17 février 2013 17.47:37, Philipp Hug a écrit : > But, you shouldn't forget that there are people staying outside LeCamp > who might need food at least for lunch, not sure about dinner though. > But this can probably be handled manually.
I think we should make it simple and bill "day food (lunch+dinner)" to non- LeCamp accomodated people. > > * Which rooms should we expect to use for people paying a premium? > > Which is the best accomodation category that should be free for > > sponsored attendees? The current proposal sets this to "Medium > > sleeping-bag room" (12-16 bed sleeping bag room) > > If you really want to charge for room-upgrades you need charge for > every room better than sleeping_bag_big or how would you decide who > gets a better room for free. Accomodation-wise, I think sleeping_bag_big and sleeping_bag_medium are roughly equivalent; so allocatiing sleeping_bag_medium to early sponsored attendees and sleeping_bag_big to late sponsored attendees sounds good to me. As for upgrades, I see two ways forward: a) no paid-for upgrade possible, we (unilaterally) decide to upgrade earlycomers if need be, to accomodate latecomers (so that earlycomers get that "reward" if their category becomes full later on); b) paid-for upgrade possible; latecomers need to pay the upgrade if their target category is fully-booked. a) is nice towards earlycomers, but brings less money; b) is "mean" (fsvo "mean" as they get a better room) towards latecomers, but brings more money. I was initially more in favour of b), but now that I wrote the two possibilities down, I'm confused. :-/ Cheers, OdyX _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
