On 2013-03-18 20:15, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
I do feel that, given that we have slipped quite a bit on our
schedule
*and* that we have got acknowledgements from both teams *and* that
questions have been actively raised on the lists for the last week at
least (and a call for further questions is semi-constant), we could
try to merge them. If there is not much more to just ask about, we
could try to streamline the process.
I don't feel that our slowness in the early stages of the bid process
is a good reason to rush the most important parts. And I haven't seen
*that* many questions answered about the bids to make me assume we're
ready for an informed decision on a venue this week.
Equally, it's not clear to me how much all the members of the DebConf
Committee have had, or will have before Friday, to deeply examine the
bids.
In addition to that, there are a number of extra steps that need to be
done before the decision meeting, including extra documents to be posted
to the list by the bids. It doesn't (for example) seem fair to me to
ask the bids at short notice to rush out versions of those important
documents in time for us to consider them before Friday.
--
Moray
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
