> > Please try to be consistent about which license you mean. The above > > quote is internally inconsistent. (CC BY-SA vs. CC BY-NC-SA) Also, > > note that those 2 licenses are incompatible with eachother. (a BY-SA > > work can't be used in a BY-NC-SA work nor the other way around. I > > think.) > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Any suggestion for final report licensing? CC-BY-SA for everything minus > > > corporate logos? > > > > Yes, CC is better for the text (than GPL) anyway. > > > > -Jeremy > > CC BY-SA is fine for me, that is what i consented originally, when sending my > pictures. > NC ist what I otherwise choose additionally, it is not a hard requirement.
Following a narrow definition of NC would be problematic - A major use case for the report is to give it to our sponsors (last years' and prospective) to try to get them to give us money again. So there *is* monetary gain from the pictures we use. Yes, not *directly* (we do not sell the report) but strong-indirectly. _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
