On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, martin f krafft wrote:

> also sprach Alexander Wirt <[email protected]> [2013.08.26.2322 +0200]:
> > I don't see any valid argument why this list should be private
> > without archiving.
> >
> > Please give me some details which this makes sense. I thought
> > debconf is an open project.
> 
> Good question. I think the reason is two-fold:
> 
>   1. Some parents are rather restrictive wrt talking about their
>      off-spring on the Tubes;
> 
>   2. debconf-kids is going to mainly about exchange and
>      self-organisation of child care at DebConf. While I think that
>      we should still strive to provide a basic framework for child
>      care, volunteers will be required to make it really useful for
>      parents. And those volunteers are probably going to be parents,
>      who might have an easier time discussing organisation if they
>      know that Google won't know about it.
> 
> Does this make sense?
No, I am sorry. Especially as a parent interested in the topic this doesn't
make sense to me. I want to follow the process, even when I won't participate
now. But I want to be able to step in later (when debconf comes back to
europe) and I want to read the archives then. 

Alex

_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team

Reply via email to