also sprach Holger Levsen <[email protected]> [2014-04-08 15:19 +0200]: > My idea would be to create two more alioth projects: debconf-historic-data > and > debconf-previous-data (or similar names), the first should collect all > previous DebConf repositories and should only be accessable by long term core > debconf-team members (committee??), while the previous-data project should > currently probable be open to dc13+14+15 team members.
Do we even need alioth? A gitolite installation would make this even easier and we could have groups for each year. Moray convinced me not to split the dc-team repo because the historic data is what current and future organisers should learn from. I don't agree, at least not while we don't have e.g. budgeting standards. I do like your idea of historic projects, but it would require rewriting of history of dc-team's repo every time we move data out. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[email protected]> : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: http://debconf14.debconf.org DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
