On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:02:58PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: > On 21/05/14 02:45, Steve Langasek wrote: > > are coming as "volunteers". The format this year has been deliberately > > designed to improve upon the status quo, with the explicit understanding > > that people who are actually coming with a work plan can ask the DPL for a > > sprint before DebConf. (And I think it's a major regression that the DC15 > > team has reverted this by reintroducing DebCamp for next year.) > > As far as I know, there has been no consensus on DC orga about this, so > it is not a regression. DC14 decided they don't want DebCamp, and DC15 > decided that they do want it. I would have loved to have this > discussion, but every time I've tried to raise it, it was mostly ignored.
I think we should have a BoF towards the end of DC14 with hopefully most of the DC/DC14/DC15 organizers about this, do a post-mortem on how it worked out for DC14 and see whether/how we can tune things for DC15. Or, if that is not possible anymore, try to come up with a consensus for DC16+. Michael _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
