On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Giacomo Catenazzi <[email protected]> wrote: > It use the word "should", not "must", so I interpret as: "Be inclusive, > do not add *unnecessary* restriction on age".
While that is a good interpretation, being explicit could help avoid arguments over which interpretation is the most valid one. Richard _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
