also sprach Steve Langasek <[email protected]> [2015-03-13 02:52 +0100]:
> If it's not encoded as an earmark from one of our "sponsors" (e.g. Debian),
> I don't see any reason for this to be encoded at the budget level.  That
> simply adds an additional constraint on how the bursaries team can use the
> funds for Debian's benefit.

It's a different kind of expense than whan bursaries are normally
using funds.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <[email protected]> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  DebConf orga team
`. `'`
  `-  DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
      DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)

_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team

Reply via email to