好, 可以幫我轉成 pdf 再寄來嗎, 感謝 對方需要實體合約嗎 ? 還是我寄電子檔即可 ? gavinlai <[email protected]> 於 2018年6月25日 週一 下午8:43寫道： > > Hi 皇甫, 柏鋒, > > 更新: 移除合約右側說明 > 合約連結: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gK6cnPCaq0DojF5JCKNvCORXBDFnoUwQF4Gpaf7dxqc/edit?usp=sharing > > 我可以請照護人員簽約後寄電子檔給您嗎? > > 謝謝協助 > > > Hi HuangFu, Pofeng, > > Update: Remove description on the right side > Contract URL: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gK6cnPCaq0DojF5JCKNvCORXBDFnoUwQF4Gpaf7dxqc/edit?usp=sharing > > May I inform the sitters to sign the contract and send it back as a PDF? > > Thanks > > > Pofeng Lee ( 李柏鋒 ) <[email protected]> 於 2018年6月21日 下午9:49 寫道： >> >> Hi, 建宇 >> >> 我們這邊沒問題了, 但為免爭議, 合約右側說明是否能考慮全數刪除 >> >> 另外建議跟保險公司詢問一下, >> 公共意外責任險的部份是否有包函這幾位臨托的小朋友與照護者 >> ( 若未包涵沒關係, 只是提醒一下, 避免之後有爭議 ) >> >> gavinlai <[email protected]> 於 2018年6月21日 週四 下午5:49寫道： >> > >> > Hi 皇甫, >> > >> > 先前有諮詢"托育小幫手"師生比的問題 >> > 我們找的工作內容是孩童陪伴(又名:陪玩)，不得涉及生理照護(例如洗澡、換尿布) >> > 就諮詢結果，保母的收托上限不適用於孩童陪伴/伴讀 >> > 因網路上只有保母的制式合約，所以我用保母的制式合約，並拿掉生理照護部分 >> > >> > 目前找到的兩名照護人員:一名有保母執照、一名未表示有保母執照(應該沒有) >> > 孩童照護的年齡分布: 五名都是三到七歲，其中一名只會參加約兩天 >> > 若活動中有任何臨時委託，會確保比例在1:3以下 >> > >> > >> > Hi HuangFu, >> > >> > I consulted sitter/child ratio problem with Bananny (a match making company >> > for sitter) before. >> > The job content for sitters is just companying with children which is >> > exclude >> > any kinds of physiological care. >> > According to the consultancy, the law for the maximum number of children >> > does not apply to this kind of job. >> > Because there is only standard contract for nanny on the web, I remove all >> > the physiological care parts based on the standard contract. >> > >> > The two sitters we found, one declares she has licence, >> > another one does not mention licence(likely no) >> > Info abount children: 5 children (3 year-old ~ 7 year-old), one of the >> > children >> > may only attend about 2 days. >> > If we have any temporary childcare request during conference, we will make >> > sure >> > the sitter/child ratio is less than 1:3. >> > >> > >> > Z. Huangfu <[email protected]> 於 2018年6月21日 下午3:13 寫道： >> >> >> >> Hi 建宇, >> >> >> >> 合約基本上沒問題，但有幾個跟托育人員和托育對象相關的事情想請你確認： >> >> >> >> 請問托育人員有無保母執照？ >> >> 預計托育的年紀範圍, 總人數限制？ >> >> 這種臨時托育是否有法規上的師生比限制？ DebConf 預計聘請幾位照護人員？ >> >> >> >> 以下資訊供參考： >> >> 平常居家保母可收托人數上限是 4 人 , 其中收托未滿2歲者最多2人 >> >> 托嬰中心的臨托服務師生比是 1:5 >> >> 幼兒園: 二歲以上至未滿三歲幼兒之班級 1:8 >> >> 幼兒園: 三歲以上至入國民小學前幼兒之班級 1:15 >> >> >> >> 再請你回覆了，謝謝 >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> 皇甫 >> >> >> >> Z. Huangfu <[email protected]> 於 2018年6月21日 下午12:49 寫道： >> >>> >> >>> Hi 建宇, >> >>> >> >>> 合約已收到並已請 OCF 董事長審閱，待董事長確認後會再通知你，謝謝 >> >>> >> >>> Best, >> >>> 皇甫 >> >>> >> >>> 2018-06-19 9:16 GMT+08:00 gavinlai <[email protected]>: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi 皇甫, >> >>>> >> >>>> 您好，我是建宇，負責籌辦DebConf孩童照護的部份 >> >>>> >> >>>> 近日已找到合適的孩童照護的人員 >> >>>> 我有收到OCF回覆的"僱用臨時工給予薪資的流程" >> >>>> 除了請對方簽領據以外，還希望與他們簽訂合約 >> >>>> >> >>>> 不知道OCF是否能協助簽訂/審視合約？ >> >>>> 合約連結: >> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gK6cnPCaq0DojF5JCKNvCORXBDFnoUwQF4Gpaf7dxqc/edit?usp=sharing >> >>>> 可以的話，我會請孩童照護人員簽名寄給OCF >> >>>> >> >>>> 謝謝 >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi HuangFu, >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm responsible for childcare part in DebConf >> >>>> >> >>>> Recently, we've found proper sitters for childcare. >> >>>> I've read the "reimburse process for temporary workers" mail from OCF. >> >>>> mail thread: [DebConf18] 僱用臨時工給予薪資的流程 >> >>>> Besides to sign the receipt, I would like to have a contract with them. >> >>>> >> >>>> Can OCF help to sign and review the contract? >> >>>> Contract URL: >> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gK6cnPCaq0DojF5JCKNvCORXBDFnoUwQF4Gpaf7dxqc/edit?usp=sharing >> >>>> If it is ok, I will contact sitters to sign the contract and sent it to >> >>>> OCF. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- >> Pofeng "informer" Lee, 李柏鋒, pofeng at gmail dot com > >
-- Pofeng "informer" Lee, 李柏鋒, pofeng at gmail dot com
