Chris Lamb dijo [Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 09:20:22AM +0100]: > My bad; I was being a bit vague in the "Bits..." > > The context was that the SFC is thinking of handling various bits of > admin for conferences but wants to have some reasonably objective (!) > measure of filtering that to conferences that align with their > philosophical goals. > > It's easy to reject the 10,000-person corporate affairs but all the > interesting cases are on the borderline and/or somewhat immature. We > were thus drafting various tests and vaguely objective "scoring" for > potential conferences that might apply for assistance which also > implicitly provides a way for organisers to see what areas they would > have to work on. > > DebConf only really figures here in that it "obviously" passes all of > the tests with flying colours so nothing really to learn.
OK - I did read it wrong. Thanks for the explanation!
