On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 06:15:16PM -0500, Lance Tagliapietra wrote: Hi,
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 10 Aug 3 23:02:23 > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 22 11:50:13 2003 > > The first example demonstates the format on the Mutt home page. > The second example demonstrates what Mutt requires. > > Does your mbox format file show this this format? my mbox format looks like the second example. You may send me a small example mbox that doesn't work with your mutt and I will look what my various Mailers do with it. I think it is ok though, mbox is very "free-form" format without terribly well defined quoting rules so it must be strict somewhere, otherwise you would see fwded messages wrongly split on a daily base. > Also, the formail suggestion didn't work, as it found the > >From line in the first example acceptable. > > formail -ds <orig-mbox > new_mbox strange, it should split the mails in every case and not generate wrong headers. Richard
