After seeing a lot of references to the lack of a 2.4 kernel for 68k mac, I am curious to know what is the background here? Can someone provide a desription of the issues?
david On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 19:47, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Hi, > I uploaded kernel-images 2.4.25 for m68k. They now include, like the latest > 2.2.25 and 2.4.24, the subarch name in the kernel name, as requested by the > d-i team, like: /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.25-amiga > Not only do you know now, if you have the right kernel-image installed, but > as an added benefit you can build your own kernel-image with the same > version without any patches (ie no need to set EXTRAVERSION), and have it > installed in parallel to the official kernel-image, since the modules > directory, config and System.map also include the subarch name. I hope these > are enough benefits for the few extra letters you have to type now. > > I'd like to hear from somebody running X if the 2.4.25 images (once they are > installed) still work with XFree. On my Athlon, I have some weird problems > with 2.4.25, like X, or better gdm not working anymore, reboot hanging, etc. > I hope its just a strange thing on i386... > > BTW no need to waste your time to test 2.4.x on a mac, still does not work > for me, but I do take patches. Works great on my Amiga though, but with a > broken video card (hint, hint), I am not running X anymore: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>uname -a > Linux aahz 2.4.25-amiga #1 Sat Mar 13 01:55:24 CET 2004 m68k unknown > > Christian
