On Thursday 08 December 2005 09:32, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Yep, that fixed it. Thx!
Does this mean that we now have a green light for m68k porters to start work on implementing 2.6 support in d-i? BTW. Congratulations to the m68k team for being the most responsive architecture to the initial mail.
pgpK4dnVKgOyY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
