On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 02:20:29PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:06:18PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:42:31AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Everytime I finally figure out a gcc bug enough to make a decent report, > > > another seems to pop up. gcc is what's killing us. gij isn't helping > > > much either. > > > > Yeah, I know. You've been putting massive amounts of work, but it seems > > endless. I wish I had more time to help, but I don't. > > Me neither. :) > > Sadly, I haven't been spending much time on d-i. d-i beta 3 is about out > and last time I tried it, partman was segfaulting. I think you saw that too.
I did (though I was thinking of it being an OOM issue rather than segfaulting -- now that you mention it, it could've been the latter). I was able to work around that issue by using partitioner, but then ska fell on its back -- this was not long before I switched it off recently. > I don't know if it's that pesky gcc -O2 problem or something else entirely. > > Further, after beta 3 comes out we'll be dropping all 2.2 and 2.4 kernels, > which should make testing interesting. Maybe it'll be a good excuse for > me to get network-console working, since my mac doesn't do 2.6 with a > keyboard yet. It's either that or get atari ported to 2.6 so I can use > aranym. > > At least there's no reason to be bored and I've certainly learned stuff > I would've never suspected. There, I can relate. I've learned interesting things about toolchains and stuff that I never thought I'd need. -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
