On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:43:42PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:03:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Not really. gcc-4.2 requires its patches to be updated; currently
> > (almost) all m68k-specific bits are commented out.
>
> Then why did the build succeed? I did upload those packages, this seems to
> be the first "successful" build of gcc-4.2 for m68k?
Because they are commented out. If they weren't commented out, those
patches would've failed to apply, and the build wouldn't even have
started :)
--
Shaw's Principle:
Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will
want to use it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
