Michael Schmitz píše v Pá 28. 12. 2007 v 04:09 +0100: > That does probably steal our precious ST-RAM space. > > I guess I'll have to just allocate the required ST-RAM for atafb early
Look at this: 64 MB of FastRAM: Memory: 68184k/68252k available (1956k kernel code, 9568k data, 100k init) atafb: screen_base 00680000 real_screen_base 00680000 screen_len 311296 128 MB: screen_base 00b00000 192 MB: screen_base 01700000 256 MB: screen_base 01600000 So the question is how the atafb decides where to put the videoram and why is it related to FastRAM size... BTW, by further playing with the -F parameter of ARAnyM I've noticed that if the total RAM is <= 64 MB (i.e. FastRAM is <= 50 MB) then the screen_base is at 0x600000 but as soon as total RAM is 65 MB the screen_base moves up by 0x080000. And when it hits 108 MB of total RAM it moves the screen_base up by another 0x080000 (to 0x700000). So there seems to be a "clever" algorithm somewhere in atafb that was not tested for real large FastRAM sizes? Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
