On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:56:03PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:22:00PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 07:10:59AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:39:17PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > > > > > > > > * build cross compiler > > > If m68k can not build with the standard gcc compiler, shouldn't that be set > > Perhaps. I didn't feel like adding back the defines they already > removed. Personally, I'd rather get the compiler fixed, but that bugs > been around a while.
That would be preferable of course. But if you build "official" images, I would put that in. It is easy to remove again once gcc has been fixed. > > in control and config/m68k/defines? I changed that, but the build still uses > > gcc-4.3... hmm > > All I changed was .... > > --- debian/config/defines (revision 12962) > +++ debian/config/defines (working copy) > @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ > > [relations] > gcc-4.3: gcc-4.3 > +gcc-4.2: gcc-4.2 Ah, that one is new, I think. > > Might be helpful, I tried to cross build gcc-4.2, but I did not get a > > libgcc2-m68k-cross > > package, why not? > > I don't know. The one from gcc-4.3 should work. Heck, I've been > trying to follow *your* directions. ;) I used crosstool, but that has been a while. Things in the kernel and the compilers are constantly changing, it seems. But now I can build kernel images again, I hope. Time to install the Amiga again, and the Atari... Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
