So you may have noticed the following in your buildd logs for python- depending packages.
| dpkg: regarding .../python-docutils_0.5-3_all.deb containing python-docutils:
| package uses Breaks; not supported in this dpkg
| dpkg: error processing
/srv/chroot/sid/var/cache/apt/archives/python-docutils_0.
| +5-3_all.deb (--unpack):
| unsupported dependency problem - not installing python-docutils
That's right, our old etch-m68k dpkg doesn't support Breaks.
The options I can think of are.
Option 1: backport dpkg to etch-m68k
Yuck. etch-m68k is old and likely insecure. Who knows what
back-porting dpkg would look like.
Option 2: lenny-lite
Build lenny with base, build-essential, and buildd-required
packages. I can probably do this one myself if there's
interest. I'll probably include anything required for d-i
too.
Option 3: lenny
Go ahead and try to do a lenny release. I think we have
nearly all the binary packages, but how to shove them into
an archive intelligently? I'm willing to help if anyone
knows how and can direct or is otherwise willing to lead.
Option 4: throw in the towel
Say it's time to retire m68k on debian. We have an ancient
glibc with borked threads. gcc-4.3 is fairly broken. A
number of packages need some bugs fixed, others need some
porting. Not so many helpers these days. Funny thing is with
aranym we have plenty of horsepower (although we need to fix
the fpu emulation) and with d-ports our buildds won't get
locked out of wanna-build. Kernel's probably in the best
shape it's been in a long time.
peace,
stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
