On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:32:20 -0600 (CST), "Stephen R. Marenka" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The other problem with etch-m68k is that we can't make changes to that > distribution any more. It sounds like we should bootstrap sid's toolchain > (and friends) starting with etch-m68k. Erm, well, that was basically my intention/the reason behind my question, even when I was not very clear about that. > Are we going to end up recompiling the archive for TLS any way? I would opt for a clean restart. Maybe a fresh start could solve some problems that only exists because of dependencies we don't need to care about anymore? But OTOH you have more oversight what is broken and what not. BTW: what about ftp-mirrors? I remember M. Casadevall dealing with own instance of ftp-master and such back then. -- Ciao... // Fon: 0381-2744150 . Ingo \X/ http://blog.windfluechter.net gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij_public_key.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
