On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi, > > I believe this may be a bug in our binutils: > > r...@ara2:~ # cat >x.s > .text > fmove.l %d1, %fpcr > r...@ara2:~ # as x.s > r...@ara2:~ # as x.s -mfidoa > x.s: Assembler messages: > x.s:2: Error: invalid instruction for this architecture; needs 68020 [68k, > 68ec020], 68030 [68ec030], 68040 [68ec040], 68060 [68ec060], cpu32 [68330, > 68331, 68332, 68333, 68334, 68336, 68340, 68341, 68349, 68360], 547x [5470, > 5471, 5472, 5473, 5474, 5475], 548x [5480, 5481, 5482, 5483, 5484, 5485] -- > statement move.l %d1,%fpcr' ignored > > Is it possible as thinks -mfidoa has no FPU? Andreas? Kazu? > This would explain the gcc-4.4 build aborting in libfortran > for the mfidoa multilib/multiarch…
I've reported the bug. http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12180 Does the libfortran file compile OK with -mcpu32 instead of -mfidoa? Finn > > Thanks in advance, > //mirabilos >
