Ben Hutchings dixit: >On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 03:46 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: >[...] >> Sorry, you missed it. But we can upload again pretty soon.
No problem. It’s still compiling anyway, so while I know the kernel and modules build and it boots, the packaging bits are still there to run. (Currently at fs/btrfs on the last flavour.) >> All looks good except that I think aufs should be fixed by changing its I agree that it should be fixed in aufs, but I used this minimal- intrusive change until the aufs people agreed on a fix, since there were a lot of patch suggestions and not much consensus (I wanted to get up to speed with things like using gcc-4.6 first, so I used a patch I knew worked). >> pr_fmt macro (which I thought I had done - sorry about that). > >I've updated aufs to the current version for Linux 3.2, which has a >different fix again. OK, we’ll see how this goes with the next upload then. Thanks! bye, //mirabilos -- [...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be- ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
