On 03/06/2012 15:28, t-rexky wrote:
Stage 2 finished in approximately 36 hours!
Good.
You have to determine how to change :
movel pc@(L9,d0:l),d0
movel d0,a0
to:
movel #L9,a0
Am I correct in assuming that this is an issue in gcc?
I don't know...
For sure "movel pc@(L9,d0:l)" should only be used when
JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION == 1.
I mention gcc, because I would expect that with CASE_VECTOR_PC_RELATIVE
0, the pc relative addressing of the jump tables should not be generated,
but it is.
From the documentation:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Misc.html#index-CASE_005fVECTOR_005fPC_005fRELATIVE-4796
The CASE_VECTOR_PC_RELATIVE macro is about the *contents* of the jump table,
which are always good in your case (absolute).
Your problem is about the code that *references* the jump table (the code I
quoted). The question is how to change it...
--
Vincent Rivière
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
