Ingo Jürgensmann dixit: > Well, gcc-4.3 just built fine with that amount of RAM. Anyway, there's no > possibility to extend that. All Amigas are maxed out at 128M. In the past that > was never an issue.
Well, in the past, we didn’t have aggressively broken/over-optimising compilers and standards that legalise that, TLS, etc. and the software was much smaller as well. > I built much larger packages that came near to 1 GB of swap usage In that case, ok. It would still exercise the memory more than before. > As I said: we need to reduce the number of packages. ;-) I don’t think that’s the solution. But we’ve disagreed on that often enough. I’d like less planning, more builds ;) (The GCC ICE/SEGV may be unrelated to the schroot error.) bye, //mirabilos -- Darwinism never[…]applied to wizardkind. There's a more than fair amount of[…] stupidity in its gene-pool[…]never eradicated[…]magic evens the odds that way. It's[…]harder to die for us than[…]muggles[…]wonder if, as technology[…]better […]same will[…]happen there too. Dursleys' continued existence indicates so. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
