Geert,
Might be cleanest - please bump the bootinfo version in that case so
we can
fall back to some default logic if the device tree is absent.
Oops, I forgot to insert the obligatory smiley.
Do tell ... I was briefly wondering about that. Weirder things have
happened.
I don't think it's worth the effort to add DT support for the existing
platforms.
If we *have* to, we can handle it in a boot wrapper. All information
is in the
existing bootinfo and arch/m68k/<mach>/config.c.
So order of appearance in bootinfo == order of priority?
Which reminds me - I still need to test making a chunk of ST-RAM
available to atafb via ioremap(), for a quick fix to the TT boot
problems.
Cheers,
Michael
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
[email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a
hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something
like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
