Hi! On Sat, 2023-10-14 at 17:33 +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: > As a side note, I believe the attached patch is wrong, it changes the > semantics of the functions. Notice that __sync_val_compare_and_swap() > returns the initial value of the variable x, whereas > __atomic_compare_exchange() returns true/false, depending on whether the > operation succeeded. The correct patch is here [1]. > > Could this be the reason why your cross-compiler for m68k seg-faults?
Hmm, good point. I will verify that. Thanks for pointing this out! Adrian
