Jason White, le Thu 29 May 2008 21:24:34 +1000, a écrit : > There is also the scenario in which the user has written a BRF file on a > braille device and wants it reverse translated, formatted and printed. In this > situation, the output device is a printer, and the input is a BRF file. Do we > need a proposal for that as well?
I don't think. > Finally, there's the problem that BRF files would be hard to distinguish > automatically from other types of ASCII input in a way that is reliable. Can't we just rely on the extension? > Find the first non-whitespace text at the start of the file, then read the > file until the next form feed is encountered. If the page length and the > longest line length are within the dimensions of the output braille device, > then it's a BRF file. Since text files are usually 80 wide, that could work indeed. > BRF files also use entirely uppercase or entirely lowercase letters, which > could serve as an additional check. Why not. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
