Hello, Luke Yelavich, le Fri 09 Jul 2010 13:24:42 +1000, a écrit : > I am writing to see whether having such a package would be worthwhile in > Debian.
It seems to me like it's a good thing, yes. > The patch to the speakup package is trivial, and requires minimal > maintenance. I'll send a patch against speakup git through in another mail. > The only question is what the binary package should be called. I see the > speakup namespace is not taken, so perhaps that is appropriate. > Alternatively, the existing Debian convention can be followed, which is > suffixing the package name with -dkms or -source. The only questino with that > convention is whether users will likely be able to find the package should > they be interested in using it. I'd tend to agree that "speakup" could be more appropriate. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100712112411.ga3...@const
