Paul Gevers <[email protected]> writes: > I just saw that emacsspeak is up for adoption (already a long time), > that upstream is active, that there is a much newer release than the one > currently in Debian. I myself am no user of such software, but as I am > contributor to debian-accessibility, I was wondering how much of you are > using it and if we (d-a11y) should start to maintain the package. What > are your experiences with the package? Are alternatives that are > actively maintained better options and should we just request removal?
While I can not really step up to maintain it, I can answer your last question. Removal of Emacspeak is simply not acceptable. There is an alternative impelementation, but I am not sure if it is actively maintained by its upstream still. Emacspeak has its fanbase, and we should provide (up-to-date) packages to satify them. -- CYa, ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/> .''`. | Get my public key via finger mlang/[email protected] : :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44 `. `' `- <URL:http://delysid.org/> <URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
