On 04/16/2013 01:05 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Since this case (xbrlapi not started) is only an inconvenience for the > user, not a stopper, I guess we would target r1, not r0?
This change is trivial and fixes an important bug so it might be accepted for r0. Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
