Paul Gevers, le Sun 13 Oct 2013 19:56:08 +0200, a écrit : > On 10/13/13 14:07, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> Good idea. How about deciding on a standard name: README.A11Y-team or > >> README.packaging or README.testing? > > > > README.testing seems better to me. > > Or even README.regression_testing?
I'd still say README.testing, simply. > >> My guess would be this README file only needs to be in the debian/ tree > >> in the source package, and does not need to go in any of the binary > >> packages, right? > > > > I'd say it should go into a binary package too. > > Why? At least because it doesn't cost much, and who knows who might find that useful :) > And then, in which one(s)? The "main" package, e.g. the one most > likely to be run by the user? Yes. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
